Re: gnome-recent, ready to rock

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 15:22, Michael Meeks wrote:
> 
> On 6 Dec 2001, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > Please excuse my ignorance.  libgal isn't considered to contain part
> > > of the core Gnome 2.0 API and is thus allowed to continue to be in
> > > flux?
> >
> > yeah, and hasn't been ported yet to GNOME 2 AFAIK.
> 
>         See the 'gal2' branch of gal. It needs stable's changes pulling in
> intelligently, I've had no real time to work on it recently.
> 
>         Oh - and it's totaly inappropriate to suggest adding a 'recent'
> type API to libgnomeui at this point; absolutely out of the question. The
> API needs careful design, use, revision and stabilization. Gal seems a
> good place for it if at all, and prolly best to start with the gnumeric
> code I think.
> 
ok, if it's ported, I've got nothing to say against putting it in GAL
:-)

cheers
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> - <rodrigo ximian com>
http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/