Re: [g-a-devel]at-spy-cspi reference counting

[David Bolter <david bolter utoronto ca>]

Bill Haneman wrote:
> David Bolter wrote:
>
> > Bill Haneman wrote:
> >
> > > David Bolter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there an implicit Accessible_ref on the accessible returned by 
> > > > AccessibleRelation_getTarget?
> > > >
> > > > Also, what about Accessible_getRelationSet: is there an implicit 
> > > > AccessibleRelation_ref for each relation in the returned array?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > yes and yes, but I thin k that if yo uuse the at-spi APIs for freeing 
> > > the relation sets that these get unreffed.
> >
> >
> >
> > There isn't an AccessibleRelationSet_unref is there?  I can't find 
> > anything similar...  unless AccessibleRelation_unref is smart...
>
>
>
> pretty sure it's AccessibleRelation_unref then.  It should be smart in 
> that respect, otherwise it's real broken and needs to be fixed, which is 
> of course another possibility.  In either case it would be a bug for a 
> client to attempt to do the unreffing of the returned relation targets 
> _in addition_ to calling AccessibleRelation_unref.

Whoops - I forgot to reply all on my last -- sorry 
gnome-accessibility-devel 'opers.

Is there a nag contact about at-spi documentation?

cheers
D
> - Bill
>
> > D