Re: [g-a-devel] success with gnopernicus 0.8.4 Gnome 2.6 in Debian

[Kenny Hitt <kenny hittsjunk net>]

Because of Sun's license, there isn't a Debian package.  You run the
install script that's part of Sun's Java.  That's why I want a way to
uninstall if it breaks things.
For the record, apt-get remove packagename will remove packagename in
Debian.

          Kenny
	  
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 02:56:44PM -0500, Tom and Esther Ward wrote:
> Hi, I don't know how Debian handles packages, but in Fedora removing Java is
> as simple as doing rpm -E j2sdk and java is gone.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kenny Hitt" <kenny hittsjunk net>
> To: <gnome-accessibility-list gnome org>;
> <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 10:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] success with gnopernicus 0.8.4 Gnome 2.6 in Debian
> 
> 
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:48:10PM -0800, Peter Korn wrote:
> > > Hi Kenny,
> > >
> > > >Hi.  Since both boxes are running Debian unstable, the versions
> > > >of Gnome libs and programs are the same.
> > > >The only difference is the Java support.  From the messages over the
> > > >last 1.5 years on this list, I've always thought Java was a requirement
> > > >for Mozilla as well.
> > >
> > > I rather doubt it is the Java.  Try adding Sun's J2SE 1.4.2 or 1.5, and
> see
> > > if you start loosing stability...
> > >
> > >
> >
> > If I do this and start having problems, how do I return to a stable
> > system?  If I remember correctly, there isn't an uninstall command for
> > Sun's Java.  Now that I finally have a stable Gnome, I don't want to
> > break it if I can't return to it easily.
> >
> >           Kenny
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> > gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
>