[g-a-devel] GTK+ a11y

[Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>]

Are we serious about a11y ?

A few weeks ago, I asked about a11y gaps in new GTK+ feature,
but I never heard anything back, except from our QA people, who
try to use the a11y framework for automated testing. 

So I finally sat down last night and wrote minimal a11y
support for GtkAssistant myself last night. 

I also note that the icon view a11y implementation has been
broken for a long time. This code has been accepted into GTK+
under the premise that we would get help with maintaining it.
Obviously, that is not happening. I'm tempted to remove the
icon view a11y code after 2.10, if nobody steps forward to
fix it. Shipping broken code helps nobody...

Matthias