Re: [g-a-devel] [Kde-accessibility] [Accessibility] a11y / D-Bus / lifecycle ...
- From: Bill Haneman <gnome billhaneman ie>
- To: michael meeks novell com
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>, accessibility-atspi-linux-foundation <accessibility-atspi lists linux-foundation org>, Mark Doffman <mark doffman codethink co uk>, kde-accessibility <kde-accessibility kde org>, accessibility-linux-foundation <accessibility lists linux-foundation org>, Li Yuan <Li Yuan Sun COM>
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] [Kde-accessibility] [Accessibility] a11y / D-Bus / lifecycle ...
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:43:20 +0000
Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:55 +0800, Li Yuan wrote:
Quite - me neither ;-) OTOH, it's a hard issue to fix: and
precedent-wise, MSAA, IAcc2, UIA, UNO a11y and atk use reference
counting :-)
Not sure if I understand this correctly. You are talking about the
possibility for object lifecycle management in D-Bus, right? Then could
we implement the Bonobo_Unknown interface in at-spi to handle the
lifecycle problem?
Yes; easily - but explicit lifecycle management is a total nightmare
for performance, efficiency, etc.
Hi Li, Michael; :-)
I agree with Michael here, if we can figure out a way to get rid of the
cross-process lifecycle management (maybe client-side stubs that 'die'
gracefully, or something similar?) then it would be a good thing.
Perhaps the current changes are the right time to introduce such a
change, since other behavioral things would be sure to change too.
Bill
Regards,
Michael.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]