Re: [g-a-devel] At-spi over dbus performance.
- From: Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com>
- To: mgorse alum wpi edu
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] At-spi over dbus performance.
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:15:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Mike Gorse <mgorse alum wpi edu>
> I have been working on a C-based AT-SPI library to replace the current
> pyatspi2 implementation, so the Python code could become much thinner
> and mainly rely on GObject introspection. This should significantly
> improve performance based on my testing, and it needs to be done
> before I can look at specific issues. I have some code in the gi
> branch of at-spi2-core, along with python code that I plan on pushing
> to a branch of pyatspi2, but it is not complete or ready for testing
> (most AT-SPI interfaces are still unimplemented).
I think that I already made that question on a weekly meeting, but
just for the record. This work to move most of the current bindings to
C could be used to have a full C-SPI bindings? Or they will be just
the enough code to improve the performance?
BR
===
API (apinheiro igalia com)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]