Re: About the mini-howto I'm writing
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Nath <nath31 ifrance com>
- Cc: jasonw ariel ucs unimelb edu au, gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: About the mini-howto I'm writing
- Date: 18 Sep 2002 13:41:07 +0100
Hi Nath,
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 11:05, Nath wrote:
> OK. Very good idea !
> Then I've done that and here is the url :
> http://natux.free.fr/gap/inst_gnome2_accessibility.txt
>
> Thanks in advance for all your help improving this text.
I get the impression that you built at a sweet spot; now gnome-mag
depends on Gtk+2.2 and gnopernicus has an (unconditional?) dependency on
gnome-mag, it's going to be really tough for anyone to build gnome-mag /
gnopernicus.
We probably need to recommend not using magnifier support, and make the
gnome-mag support in gnopernicus optional. Building a multi-head gtk+ is
just too difficult for most users.
Apart from that - it looks great :-)
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]