Re: Unmet library requirements when configuring gnopernicus.
- From: "Rich Caloggero" <rjc MIT EDU>
- To: "Gnome Accessibility Users (mailing list)" <gnome-accessibility-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Unmet library requirements when configuring gnopernicus.
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:26:27 -0400
Ditto... I'm confused about these messages too.
Rich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Mielke" <dave mielke cc>
To: "Gnome Accessibility Users (mailing list)"
<gnome-accessibility-list gnome org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: Unmet library requirements when configuring gnopernicus.
Can any of you explain how the following unmet library requirements (when
configuring gnopernicus) are to be interpreted? They're all of the form
"name-version1 >= version2". It looks like it's saying that I currently have
"version1" of "name" whereas gnopernicus needs "version2". There are two
problems with this guess, though. Firstly, "version1" doesn't always
correspond
to what I currently have. Secondly, "version1" for some of them already is
greater than "version2". Here's the actual configure error.
configure: error: Library requirements (
libgnome-2.0 >= 1.102.0
gconf-2.0 >= 1.1.5
glib-2.0 >= 1.3.12
libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.6
gnome-speech-1.0 >= 0.0.2
) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if
your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.
--
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | I believe that the Bible is the
Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario | Word of God. Please contact me
EMail: dave mielke cc | Canada K2A 1H7 | if you're concerned about Hell.
http://familyradio.com/ | http://mielke.cc/bible/
_______________________________________________
gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]