Re: 2.6 proposed module: dasher
- From: David Bolter <david bolter utoronto ca>
- To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59-gap srcf ucam org>
- Cc: Peter Korn <Peter Korn Sun COM>, Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>, Murray Cumming Comneon com, gnome-accessibility-list gnome org, release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: 2.6 proposed module: dasher
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:11:01 -0500
Hi Matthew, everyone,
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:22:35PM -0800, Peter Korn wrote:
[snip]
Dasher as a text entry replacement is tremendous. But until Dasher is able
to provide a complete alternate navigation system of a desktop for a user,
how can the Dasher user be independent? Should Dasher be a companaion
application to GOK? Is there interest in making Dasher a desktop-wide
assistive technology?
Dasher in its current form allows users to start and manipulate the
majority of applications to some degree of functionality. At present,
however, it does also require the ability to focus the desired window or
text entry area. This is (a-ha ha ha) just a small matter of coding.
Apart from that, I don't think that as of now Dasher users would be
significantly handicapped compared to, say, GOK users.
I think it's a worthwhile inclusion in 2.6, since it demonstrably does
increase the range of users we can support. By the 2.8 timeframe that
range could be increased further, but I think this is equally true
regardless of whether it's included now or not.
I have used Dasher and have seen it used by two experts and have been
impressed. I think it is a novel and interesting alternative input
mechanism. With a wide audience it can continue to evolve and grow (as
can GOK). There is a great potential for unexpected "curb cut" uses
which can be better discovered with a wide audience.
One thing that has concerned many of us with the assistive technology
software, is what reaction the unintended audience will have, and how to
better prepare John Smith for what to expect from such an application.
Having said that, I think Dasher is probably okay in this respect but we
need to ask ourselves if it is being included as an integral gnome tool,
or if it is been included as a stand-alone-ish experimental-ish text
entry tool. And whatever we decide we need to let the user know what to
expect.
I'd like to see it in.
(Sometimes I wonder if the Gnome Applications Menu (as distributed)
should have an Experimental, or Introducing, submenu where we can with
clear conscience put novel and exciting, but young applications.)
cheers,
D
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]