Re: [g-a-devel] success with gnopernicus 0.8.4 Gnome 2.6 in Debian
- From: "Tom and Esther Ward" <tward1978 earthlink net>
- To: <gnome-accessibility-list gnome org>, <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>, "Kenny Hitt" <kenny hittsjunk net>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] success with gnopernicus 0.8.4 Gnome 2.6 in Debian
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:56:44 -0500
Hi, I don't know how Debian handles packages, but in Fedora removing Java is
as simple as doing rpm -E j2sdk and java is gone.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenny Hitt" <kenny hittsjunk net>
To: <gnome-accessibility-list gnome org>;
<gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] success with gnopernicus 0.8.4 Gnome 2.6 in Debian
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:48:10PM -0800, Peter Korn wrote:
> > Hi Kenny,
> >
> > >Hi. Since both boxes are running Debian unstable, the versions
> > >of Gnome libs and programs are the same.
> > >The only difference is the Java support. From the messages over the
> > >last 1.5 years on this list, I've always thought Java was a requirement
> > >for Mozilla as well.
> >
> > I rather doubt it is the Java. Try adding Sun's J2SE 1.4.2 or 1.5, and
see
> > if you start loosing stability...
> >
> >
>
> If I do this and start having problems, how do I return to a stable
> system? If I remember correctly, there isn't an uninstall command for
> Sun's Java. Now that I finally have a stable Gnome, I don't want to
> break it if I can't return to it easily.
>
> Kenny
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]