gnome-mag and gnopernicus magnifier services TODOs
- From: Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diogenes <cerdiogenes yahoo com br>
- To: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
- Subject: gnome-mag and gnopernicus magnifier services TODOs
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:02:05 -0300
Hi,
We are with a group in a university studying accessibility and we want
to know what gnome-mag and gnopernicus needs to improve and what is
essencial to do now to grant a good development in the future, because
we think that if us start to develop in other way that don't be
compatible with these projects is an duplication of efforts.
What must be implemented in gnome-mag and gnopernicus to improve the
magnifier services?
I used gnopernicus and saw that the magnifier service provided by
gnome-mag have some problems when it's started, leaving the magnifier
area with a lot of trash and after some time of use the update of the
trashed areas stay ok. Why the trashed areas don't works fine after the
start of the application? What it can be and what must be done to solve it?
What are the plans in gnome-mag, mainly for the full-screen. There is
any roadmap of what can be used to acquire a good full-screen service. I
saw this video http://vizzzion.org/stuff/xgl_wanking.avi and is showed
some operations in zoom in and out with very amazing results (anyone can
identify what was used to acquire that?). The Composite Extension is a
good solution?
I run once full-screen magnification with a dummy device, but the
results aren't very good. The magnified area sometimes stay only in 1/4
of the screen, there are ways to control this?
Someone here saw Lunar or ZoomText magnifier for Windows? They have some
resources very interesting in half magnifier screen mode. How the same
effect can be acquired? I think that using the composite extension can
be a way. What do you think?
The documentation of gnopernicus (the magnifier part) and gnome-mag are
very poor. What is the better thing to do, an API reference with doxygen
or class diagrams? An API reference is simple to generate with doxygen,
why this was not done yet? There is no need for it yet?
Thanks,
Carlos.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]