Re: Orca 0.2.3
- From: Thomas Ward <tward1978 earthlink net>
- To: Janina Sajka <janina rednote net>
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org, Tomas Cerha <cerha brailcom org>, orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Orca 0.2.3
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:35:54 -0400
Janina Sajka wrote:
I believe those two environments rely on "gui
configuration tools," so I am not surprised people would talk about
wanting "gui configuration tools." But, it's the wrong approach.
Hello. I wouldn't go as far to say it is the wrong approach, but I do
believe it should not be the only means of configuration. There will be
those Windows converts who's major gripe with Linux and other gnu
operating systems is there is not enough gui configuration. There are
the console die-hards that absolutely want the power of the console. The
only medium between the two extremes is to provide both methods of
configuration.
We must remember a console die-hard can't convert a gui die-hard to a
console die-hard and the other way around. So providing both I feel is
the best solution here.
One last point Janina's point of view generally stems from the
contention if the gui isn't properly configured for access then the
console must be used. This is true. However, if the gui is working with
accessibility then there is nothing saying the gui screen reader like
Orca can't be used to do configurations in a gui environment, and gui
tools can be used.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]