Re: gnome-mag's memory usage

[Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diogenes <cerdiogenes yahoo com br>]

Hi,

Em Seg, 2006-08-21 às 11:05 +0100, Bill Haneman escreveu:
> Hi Aurelian
> 
> Although I am not aware of any big memory leaks in gnome-mag, this
> sounds like a bug.  Opening a bug in gnome bugzilla would be best, then
> you can post your attachments.  
> 
> For finding memory leaks on Linux, I highly recommend using valgrind. 
> If you can run gnome-mag in valgrind it's likely to provide excellent
> diagnostics.  Carlos, perhaps you could help investigate this issue?

Aurelian told me about this bug some time ago in off. I ask him to try
learn bugzilla and put it there (he also know about other bugs, I
think).

Certainly that I will investigate it with more attention, but I don't
know when I will be able to give a feedback about this.

> 
> Bill
> 
> On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 10:13, Aurelian Radu wrote:
> > Hello, lists,
> > 
> > After half an hour of using gnome-mag, memory usage for the magnifier
> > process increased to around 625 MB, as seen in the attached
> > screenshots. Is this a memory leak or is it a feature? Is this huge
> > cache really necessary? It is true that the magnifier process releases
> > some memory when needed by other applications, but the system becomes
> > really slow. 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Aurelian Radu
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> > gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list


	
	
		
_______________________________________________________ 
O Yahoo! est�e cara nova. Venha conferir! 
http://br.yahoo.com