Re[2]: Gnopernicus vs Orca

["Christian" <christian08 runbox com>]

Hello,
Many thanks for that info!
Will have a look at it. I am running latest version of Debian, is it easy to get Orca up and running?
Managed to instal Gnopernicus.
Many thanks,
Christian




On 2006-07-06 at 10:59 Cody wrote:

>Hi,
>
>  Orca is much better in my opinion mainly because it is scriptable,
>allowing scripts to be writen to control how orca speaks and acts in
>different environments. Gnopernicus does not do this. From my experience,
>orca works somewhat ok with firefox, and works with gaim better do to a
>special script writen to read incoming messages which some people have
>problems with though others may not. Orca is all about customization,
>gnopernicus is more or less wysiwyg. Gnopernicus works with gaim, but in
>older versions then 1.0 you will need to export the gtk modules.
>
>export gtk_MODULES=gail:atk-bridge
>
>  Orca works with gaim right out of the box. gnopernicus does not work
>well,
>or at all in my situation with firefox. though make sure you enable the
>caret naviagation in FF when using either gnopernicus or orca. you can
>read
>more about orca at http://orca.gnome.org
>
>HTH,
>  Cody----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christian" <christian08 runbox com>
>To: <gnome-accessibility-list gnome org>
>Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:54 AM
>Subject: Gnopernicus vs Orca
>
>
>> Hello all,
>> Maybe someone on this list can tell me what is better with Orca compared
>> with Gnopernicus. Can I get better access with Orca when it comes to
>> reviewing the screen with the virtual focus or simular?
>> Many thanks,
>> Christian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
>> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list