Re: LibGTop 0.99.2 and GTop 0.99.2 released

["Peter Housel" <housel pacbell net>]

----- Original Message -----
From: Martin Baulig <martin@home-of-linux.org>
To: <gnome-announce-list@gnome.org>; <gnome-list@gnome.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 1999 4:09 PM
Subject: LibGTop 0.99.2 and GTop 0.99.2 released


>Hello guys,
>
>I just released new versions of LibGTop 0.99.2 and GTop 0.99.2.
>
>* Location:
>
> ftp://ftp.home-of-linux.org/pub/libgtop/0.99.2/libgtop-0.99.2.tar.gz
> ftp://ftp.home-of-linux.org/pub/gtop/0.99.2/gtop-0.99.2.tar.gz
>
>  There's also a new release of the LibGTop guile and perl bindings
>  (you'll need the new version of gnome-guile for this):
>
> /pub/libgtop/0.99.2/libgtop-bindings-0.99.2.tar.gz
> /pub/libgtop/0.99.2/gnome-guile-0.99.1.tar.gz
>
>  However, this is only required if you want to rebuild the documentation
>  yourself and the documentation is pretty out of date.
>
>* CVS:
>
> libgtop - tag LIBGTOP_0_99_2
> gtop - tag GTOP_0_99_2
>
>LibGTop 0.99.2 only fixes compilation errors over 0.99.1 and 0.99.0, so if
>you already have a working version installed you probably won't need to
>upgrade.
>
>GTop 0.99.2 is the first stable release after a longer period of time and
>has some new features including textual status line and SMP support in the
>process bar.
>
>It is also feature-freezed for GNOME 1.0, so only bug-fixes will go in
until
>we have GNOME 1.0 ready. As with gnome-libs and gnome-core, the
GNOME_STABLE
>branch of GTop is now deprecated as well, all changes should go into HEAD -
>merging all the time is really a hard job ...
>
>Martin
>
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>   Martin Baulig - Angewandte Mathematik - Universitaet Trier
>   martin@home-of-linux.org, http://www.home-of-linux.org/
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>--
>        FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>         To unsubscribe: mail gnome-announce-list-request@gnome.org with
>                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>