Re: ORBit (was Re: * mico)

[Christopher Blizzard <blizzard appliedtheory com>]

Elliot Lee wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Jason Gilbert wrote:
> 
> > I only had a few added requirements:
> > multithreaded
> 
> Why? We can do it without threads, and threads are not very portable in
> the grand scheme of things. Threaded programming also adds a whole new
> level of complexity, and I'd like to make as simple an ORB as possible,
> not a complex one ;-)
> 
> (Simple means easy-to-read code & a straightforward design, not "lacking
> in features").
> 

Can we at least make it thread safe?  Please?

--Chris

-- 

------------
Christopher Blizzard
AppliedTheory Communications, Inc. 
http://odin.appliedtheory.com/
blizzard@appliedtheory.com
------------