Re: OOP, C, COM, and Bonobo

[Mathieu Lacage <mathieu eazel com>]

ryan butterflysoft org writes:

> Please allow me to clarify my question.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com> wrote:
> >
> >> But, where is the design going on?  I can't find class diagrams (or
> >> any other representation, short of textual) of the GTK+/Bonobo
> >> object model.
> >
> >I did not know that lack of diagrams meant that the code did not have
> >any OO features.  
> >
> >We could use better documentation certainly.
> 
> I was not searching for diagrams per se. I was looking for the "product" of the GTK and Bonobo design.  If you took your tacit design and expressed it via code then "read the code" would be the correct answer I suppose.  You are a bright individual no doubt, so I don't believe that I need to defend the value articulating a design via models (and the subsequent discovery of flaws and details).  If no models exist I might be interested in creating and maintaining those.  I believe a communication of the GTK and Bonobo designs, unencumbered by the ambiguities of the english (or C) language, could be a valuable resource for newcomers.

I would love to see those and I would be more than happy to help you in any possible way.

Mathieu

> 
> -ryan
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-components-list mailing list
> gnome-components-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list
> 

-- 
Mathieu Lacage <mathieu eazel com>