Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Bringing Bonobo to the masses :)
- From: Andreas Rottmann <a rottmann gmx at>
- To: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- Cc: Chris Kuklewicz <chrisk mit edu>, gnome-components-list gnome org, GTK-- Mailing List <gtkmm-main lists sourceforge net>, jean de ratuld quadratec fr, GNOME hackers <gnome-hackers nuclecu unam mx>, SigC++ Mailing List <libsigc-mlist lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Bringing Bonobo to the masses :)
- Date: 14 Sep 2000 20:50:07 +0200
ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org> writes:
> > started ? (see http://www.8ung.at/rotty/sigc/index.html) Or would
> > that add an unwanted dependency on libsigc++?
>
> Bonobo-- will use Gtk--, so it will depend on libsigc++ anyway.
>
Yes, but isn't Bonobo something widget-set independent (with default
to GNOME widgets, of course)? I strongly vote for seperating the
GUI-dependent stuff into its own shlib, or whatever.
BTW: That's something I miss about bakery - it's too tightly bound to
Gnome/Gtk. Doc/View is something that applies to console apps as well.
Regards, Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | Dru ICQ | 54523380 ICQ | a rottmann gmx at
Pfeilgasse 4-6/725 | A-1080 Wien | Austria | Europe
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: www.8ung.at/rotty/dru.asc
Fingerprint | 3E9A C485 49A4 1D17 2EA7 2BA7 22AE C9BF 8173 6279
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
