Re: (no subject)
- From: Ariel Burbaickij mni fh-giessen de
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: (no subject)
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:30:55 +0100
Quoting Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>:
> Hi Ariel,
>
> On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 16:13, Ariel Burbaickij mni fh-giessen de wrote:
> > The COM book I have talks about client saving
> > properties of object on its behalf. So as I see
> > Bonobo is based on the same ideas so I do allow
> > myself to pose some questions here (not to mention
> > that I surely prefer free way of development and
> > ability to look behind the curtain) I rahter
> > cannot grasp:
>
> Ok - so, there is no free way of development ;-)
>
> > 1) Why object cannot and should not save its properties itself?
>
> Arguably - it's best for an object to have a PersistStream interface,
> and be able to persist itself to a stream somehow, rather than it being
> done via serializing the PropertyBag.
Can one say that Property Bag is something similar to cookies as used
on the Web ?
Yours sincerely
Ariel Burbaickij
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]