Re: Default window manager
- From: Craig Kelley <ink inconnu isu edu>
- To: Andreas Hyden <andreas hyden telia com>
- cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Default window manager
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 13:28:46 -0600 (MDT)
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Andreas Hyden wrote:
> Any proof?
> I nooticed it my self.. and all people I know..
> One of Gnome's goals is to provide a desktop environment
> for beginners...
Perhaps you are thinking of E with a default theme like Hand of God.
I'm running GNOME right now and enlightenment is 17th on the list (sorted
by memory usage) behind the panel (6MB), xmms (4.2MB), gnome-terminal
(3.2MB), gmc (3MB), mini_commander (2.1MB), xfs, gnome pager and some
others (including the X server and netscape, of course).
> When for instance a beginner install it and use enlightenmnent they noticed
> that the memory isn't enough and it's slow... and they think. "Gnome is
> slow and buggy, better to use KDE instead".
> Why don't just replace enlightenment with another wm?
E is using up 1.6MB on my system right now.
Can we pick on something else please?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]