Re: [sauron charm il fontys nl: Re: GNOME::Editor]

> Hmm, yes.
> Let's see what miguel has to say about Storage vs. FileBuffer first before
> I go changing stuff :)

I say, lets kill the FileBuffer concept.  It is an editor
implementation-specific feature and should not be exposed.

> Hmm, good point. I could add an exception that implementations that don't
> have regexps can return. As to what regexps we support, we could just say
> in the docs 'the regexp needs to conform to regex(7) (for example), right?

Good idea.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]