Re: shlib panel applets (e.g. fish, gkb)
- From: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- To: Steve Haslam <araqnid debian org>
- cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: shlib panel applets (e.g. fish, gkb)
- Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 13:19:29 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 31 May 1999, Steve Haslam wrote:
> I suggest putting them in /usr/lib/gnome-panel/applets or some similar
> place
> and just naming them "libfoo_applet.so".
>
> [ aside: this came up because when I separate libraries into packages,
> the *.so.0 symlinks go in the normal package and the *.so symlinks go
> in the -dev package. So the applets wouldn't work without the -dev
> package. But putting the *.so symlinks in the normal package
> contravenes policy and looks odd. ]
1. The *.so.0 symlinks don't belong in any package - they get created by
ldconfig.
2. Adhering to policy in the face of reason sounds like a bad idea. :)
3. It looks "odd" because the libs are used different from normal ones.
> If I managed to change gnome-core so that the panel applets worked
> like this, would the change likely be put in upstream, or would I have
> to keep maintain a (probably rather unpleasant) patch?
Yea we can do it - the hard part is figuring out how to make libtool do it
cleanly. I don't think the location change thing will work, at least for
gnome 1.0.x, because of the expected location of 'plugins'.
-- Elliot
"We're sorry, we didn't know it was supposed to be invisible."
- Sign carried outside US embassy.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]