Re: Canonical *.defs files?

[Eric Kidd <eric kidd pobox com>]

On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 12:33:23PM -0500, Elliot Lee wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> > Well, the canonical file should be in the gtk+ sources, but I doubt
> > this is the case nowadays.  A pretty much updated version souhld be in
> > the sources of the gtk guile bindings as well as the per/gtk bindings.
> > As the format of the .defs file is not currently satisfactory for all
> > the uses we found for it, we should probably get toghether and define a
> > standard that suits all our needs so that we can all use the canonical
> > version, whatever that will be.
> 
> If you're interested, I posted a proposal for this to gtk-devel-list a
> while ago - see
> http://www.gnome.org/mailing-lists/archives/gtk-devel-list/1999-September/0027.shtml

Interesting. This looks like a much better approach. What would be the
first step towards this goal?

Cheers,
Eric