Re: Gnome key bindings (was Re: gnome keys sucks)
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Michael ROGERS <M Rogers cs ucl ac uk>
- Cc: Telsa Gwynne <hobbit aloss ukuu org uk>,gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gnome key bindings (was Re: gnome keys sucks)
- Date: 24 Aug 2000 13:59:59 -0400
Michael ROGERS <M.Rogers@cs.ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> I suppose that's possible. The solution I had in mind was just to add
> default keybindings to those apps that didn't have them, and encourage
> those apps that already had defaults to use the same defaults. A GConf
> solution would require more work and more thought (you'd have to consider
> every situation where the defaults *might* cause a problem, rather than
> considering each app individually), but it would have the advantage of a
> single place to reconfigure all your apps, I suppose.
>
There's no point getting distracted by this though, the document
should describe the defaults, not how accelerators are implemented.
Then GNOME and KDE can figure out how to implement it.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]