Re: setuid bit neccesary for GNOME?
- From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery ece cmu edu>
- To: mcnichol austin ibm com, Padraig Obriain ireland sun com, ante Update UU SE
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: setuid bit neccesary for GNOME?
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:34:03 -0500
On Friday, January 19, 2001 09:26:07 -0600, mcnichol austin ibm com wrote:
+-----
| I would double check this. I would guess that without setuid,
| xscreensaver cannot get to the password file. The effect of this would
| be that regular users would not be able to unlock their screen.
+--->8
It will work on Linux because Linux-PAM will call out to a setuid program
to check the password... which only works for the invoker; the program
won't check anyone else's password. Thus, the user's password will work
but root's won't.
On other systems which use shadow passwords of any stripe (including AIX's
/etc/security stuff) it must be setuid root.
--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery kf8nh apk net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery ece cmu edu
electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]