Re: official support for more scripting languages in gnome needed
- From: Ben Ford <ben kalifornia com>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- Cc: kh_naba 123india com, Andy Tai <atai gnu org>, gnome-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org, hvv hippo ru, atai atai org, david kalifornia com
- Subject: Re: official support for more scripting languages in gnome needed
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:35:18 -0800
> > >
> > > And it will also result in at least one fewer Gnome user. Me.
> > >
> >
> > And me. :-).
>
> Why should you care what language a useful tool is written in? For many
> tasks, there is no noticable speed or CPU usage problems when choosing a
> scripting language. Often these languages let the programmer write
> shorter programs that are less likely to have bugs in them. Why is this a
> bad thing?
>
> Do you refuse to play AisleRiot because the game rules are written in
> scheme?
>
> I am not sure I am in favour of rewriting existing applications in python
> or perl just for the sake of using a scripting language though.
>
> James.
You are making the argument for Visual Basic. Do you remember the
proliferation of *very* bad programs when VB hit? What is the next step?
Perl macros in email?
-b
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]