Re: API freeze for GNOME 2
- From: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, <murrayc usa net>, gnome-2-0-list <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, gnome-devel <gnome-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: API freeze for GNOME 2
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:26:41 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Owen,
On 14 Nov 2001, Owen Taylor wrote:
> By 2.2, I meant "post-2.0 release with API additions and binary
> compatibility".
>
> I don't know of any post-2.0 version number plans in for GNOME
> at this point. For GTK+, what I want to do is:
>
> 2.0
> 2.0.x Bug fixes
> 2.2 Source/binary compatible release with multihead support, other
> API additions
> 2.4? Another source/binary compatible release
> 2.6?
> 3.0: Source/binary incompatible release in the hazy future
>
> Haven't completely gotten Tim to agree with me yet on this versioning
> scheme, but we are going to be restricting ourselves to source/binary
> compatible additions for the mid-term future in any case.
That's great - really :-) At least this has been thought out
for gtk+.
No, how about the rest of gnome? Is there a possibility that
this could be agreed on as a general, hazy plan for the gnome desktop
as a whole?
Cheers,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]