RE: gconf

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:53 +0100, Foster, Gareth wrote:
> Maybe if I find something significant that is required and not mentioned I
> will write it up. Using gconf (or gconfmm in my case) has been pretty
> painless, but the schema side of things is a little more tricky.

In part it's just inherently confusing the way it works now. The biggest
bang for the buck would be to fix up things to work in a simpler way.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]