Re: [Anjuta-devel] Why anjuta2?

[Naba Kumar <kh_naba gmx net>]

On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:35, Biswapesh Chattopadhyay wrote:
>
> 5. Anjuta1 is a dead branch - only minor features and bug fixes. 
> 
It's not dead.

> Again, this was a common decision made by consensus - but this is a
> decision that *has been* made and unlikely to be reversed. 
> 
The decision taken was to boost the development of anjuta2 and *not* to
trash anjuta1. I don't see a reason to completely abandone anjuta
development with all the hard-work we have put to it. The architecture
may not be 'cutting-edge', but it works and people find it usable. In
the distant future, anjuta1 may become out-dated and unusable, but that
is no good reason to fold the anjuta development now.

-- 
Regards,
-Naba

You can go anywhere you want if you look serious and carry a clipboard.