Re: [GDL] build problems
- From: Gustavo Giráldez <gustavo giraldez gmx net>
- To: Jeroen Zwartepoorte <jeroen xs4all nl>
- Cc: "John (J5) Palmieri" <johnp martianrock com>, Gnome Devtools list <gnome-devtools gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [GDL] build problems
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:07:21 -0300
Hi!
Sorry for the long absence, I was enjoying my last vacation days :-)
Back at home now.
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 06:18, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 06:51, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > I ran into a couple of build problems with GDL.
>
> Gustavo changed some stuff recently to the build process, but it builds
> fine on my machines (fedora + ydl).
Yeah, for maintainer cvs builds both full deprecated flags and error
compiler warnings are enabled. For released tarballs they are disabled
though.
> > * -fno-strict-aliasing needs to be set as a build flag or it will warn
> > on (gpointer *) &widget. Since -Werror is set this causes GDL not to
> > build.
>
> Should we really set -Werror as a default in the build? I know i removed
> it from glimmer at one point because different platforms generated
> different warnings and broke the build.
In my experience, setting -Werror has helped me a lot in finding both
typos and very weird bugs. I prefer not to remove them, but fix the
warnings instead.
I'm also using Fedora, but I got that compiler warning. I already
committed a fix for it. FWIW, my GCC version is 3.3.2.
> > * libssl development files are needed for the build (why do we use SSL?)
> > but does not error out when running ./configure.
>
> I have no idea why we would need libssl. Strange.
This is weird. The only library I can think of which might need libssl
is gnome-vfs. Maybe it's a bug in its pkg-config file? I have an
up-to-date jhbuild HEAD build and gdl compiles fine now.
Regards,
Gustavo
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]