Re: Changes to auto-indentation in ~2.29.9?
- From: Paolo Borelli <pborelli katamail com>
- To: Julian Lam <julian lam gmail com>
- Cc: gnome-devtools gnome org
- Subject: Re: Changes to auto-indentation in ~2.29.9?
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:03:52 +0100
Hi Julian,
as you found out the change was intended: we often received the
opposite complaint that the previous behavior led to trailing
whitespaces, which are considered bad style to the point of being marked
in red in git.
Personally I do not use autoindent so I do not have a strong opinion on
this.
Paolo
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 13:22 -0400, Julian Lam wrote:
> As it turns out, it seems like this has been standard for quite some
> time:
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtksourceview/commit/?id=186127e1163236b365d658e7121684ccfa16c3c3
>
> Unfortunate, but perhaps an option could be added to allow trailing
> spaces to be kept?
>
> - Julian
>
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Julian Lam <julian lam gmail com>
> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> An amateur coder here, using gedit, since it has nice
> highlighting, auto-tab, etc, but without the learning curve of
> vim or emacs (I'll get to them someday...)
>
> Anyways, since I upgraded to the Lucid beta, the auto-indent
> function seems to have slightly changed.
> Example: If I was writing at an indent of one tab, and I
> pressed enter, the indent stays. However, if I press enter
> again, although the indent is inherited for the third line,
> the indent of the SECOND line changes to zero.
>
> Prior to lucid, the following lines would ALL inherit the
> indent level of the previous line, even if I pressed enter
> multiple times. If I wanted to get rid of the indentation, I
> could always press "Shift-Enter".
>
> It seems as though because gedit detected an empty line, the
> auto-indentation is not inherited.
>
> Because I often like to return to previous sections of code to
> add more, the lack of indent on empty lines is jarring, and
> makes me waste time (just a tiny bit) indenting back to where
> I was previously.
>
> Is there any way I can change this behaviour back? Or at
> least... express my displeasure at how gedit assumes something
> I did not intend?
>
> Thanks,
> Julian Lam
> Hons. BMus. III, McMaster University
> (416) 843-4323 | http://www.kareeser.com
>
>
>
> --
> Julian Lam
> Hons. BMus. III, McMaster University
> (416) 843-4323 | http://www.kareeser.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devtools mailing list
> gnome-devtools gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]