Re: Content of GNOME Developer's Guide

[Mark Galassi <rosalia cygnus com>]

    John> Oh, gee, I don't know.  I suppose licensing is wide open at
    John> this point.  I had assumed a GPL, but I have no overriding
    John> attachment to it (for docs anyway).  What would you suggest?

I think docs for GNU projects should be GPLed.  "verbatim only" terms
are an abomination for a manual describing free software: docs should
be as free as the software.