Re: Gnome and C++



Miguel de Icaza <miguel@gnu.org> writes:

| Well, if you want to save time, you really should look into using
| glade.

I use glade for GUI experimentations, but I usually write the
source by hand otherwise, though as glade is getting much better now I
do cut and paste sometimes too :-)

| This loads the GUI and lets me modify/customize the behaviour.  There
| is really nothing I can think of that glade-- would do for you.

You can use glade-- to generate code for your program if you do not
want to use libglade.

But all this is beside the point. Telling people to using glade or
libglade cannot be an excuse for not writing proper documentation as
Frederik Bilhaut asked for. I'm not saying that you or the gnome
people should write documentation for every wrapper there is, but
perhaps the people who make the wrappers will. It certainly would be
nice to have some documentation at some point.

-- 
Preben Randhol             oO     "Don't think about domination,  think
[randhol@pvv.org]        .`  ;     about freedom, it doesn't dominate."
[www.pvv.org/~randhol/]   \ G                  -- RMS, LinuxWorld 1999.
                           `_) n o m e 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]