GPL references in docs





Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> 
> Hi folks:
> 
> it recently occured to me that while we  spent much time discussing
> the license to be used for the docs, most of our docs do not give the
> licensing terms for the *software* they document. This, of course, is
> given in COPYING file in the source, and often also in the "about"
> box, but IMHO, this should be repeated in the docs. SOmething like
> this (in the "authors" section):
> 
> ----------------
That sounds like a good idea to me-- but if it's in the "About" section,
and in the "COPYING" file, isn't that enough?



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]