Re: There is no GHB 2.0
- From: Bill <romp infinet com>
- To: Dan Mueth <d-mueth uchicago edu>
- Cc: Ali Abdin <aliabdin aucegypt edu>, gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: There is no GHB 2.0
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:19:27 -0400
I think that calling it "Nautilus Help Browser" will tie this too much into Eazel
and their work. It is one thing to have Miguel, Nat, et.al. into Helix Code;
quite
another to have another company's work taking over what we have done. This
may not be a big deal to everyone else but to me it does make a difference to
feel of the direction of the project. Sort of like building a bridge, only to
have
Campells Soup come along and want the name changed to "Chunky Soup
Span" or something like that.
Maybe we could call it "System Help Browser"?
Dan Mueth wrote:
<snip!>
This is a good point - since the help browser will be built into Nautilus,
> what should we call it? Do people favor changing the name to the
> "Nautilus Help Browser"?
>
--
./romp
"Put your right hand in the box."
"What's in the box?"
"Pain."
Dune - by Frank Herbert
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]