Re: A few responses
- From: Chuck Dale <bug aphid net>
- To: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: A few responses
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:36:44 +1000
Wrote James M. Cape on Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 10:29:35AM -0500:
> Chuck Dale wrote:
> [less toolbar options good]
> Well, they may be found in the menus, but there is then a *huge* waste
> of space on the toolbar.
>
> [ File Edit View Settings Help ]
> [ **Back** ***Up*** *Forwrd* "all this space is just wasted" ]
> [ Location: [________________________________________________][V] ]
>
> The point is that while you may only use three of the buttons, the fact
> that the toolbar is arranged horizontally forces have more unless you
> want to waste all that space. I can construct screenshots to further
> demonstrate if necessary.
As in all design, whitespace is as important as non-whitespace.
(Ok so I'm not a design expert but you know the principle.)
Sure you are wasting space. But you need to make decisions of usability.
A much simpler UI makes it easier for newer users. cf. MacOS. You lose
functionality. But you gain usability.
Let experienced users add buttons that they will use.
Chuck
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]