gnome-user-docs and gnome-devel-docs
- From: Dan Mueth <dan eazel com>
- To: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: gnome-user-docs and gnome-devel-docs
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Hi folks,
I had two new GNOME modules created in CVS today: gnome-user-docs and
gnome-devel-docs
They are both empty. My plans are to create and ship just two GNOME
packages which are strictly documentation. So, we can slowly move over
any good documentation into these modules from their current locations.
There are some packages which will die in the process:
gnome-users-guide
gnome-user-faq
gdp-handbook
Some examples of what these modules will contain:
gnome-user-docs:
Glossary
Introduction to GNOME
Introduction to Linux
GNOME Users Guide
GNOME User FAQ
GNOME Quick Reference
Joining the GNOME Project
...
gnome-devel-docs:
GNOME Developer FAQ
GDP Handbook
GTP Handbook
(any white papers which are up to date)
(any tutorials which are up to date)
(any other developer documents which are good and up to date)
...
Generally speaking, gnome-user-docs would ship with the main GNOME
release, and gnome-devel-docs would be in the extra apps packages since
most people don't need them.
So, I think we generally want to get someone with CVS root access to move
these pieces into place from their current locations in CVS, approving
this of course with anybody who may have co-authored each text so they
don't think their doc dissappeared.
This is our chance to start with a fresh module, so lets be careful to
keep things tidy and keep the build system working. Remember the basic
directory layout:
gnome-xxx-docs/<docname>/<locale>/{stuff}
gnome-xxx-docs/<docname>/<locale>/{stuff}/figures/
Also be sure that anything you put in these modules are up to date,
written in DocBook/SGML, and licensed under the FDL and appropriately
state so in their legalnotice.
Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]