Re: Where should these docs go?

[Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>]

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:43:00PM -0600, John Fleck wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 10:01, hobbit aloss ukuu org uk wrote:
[...]
> > I'm inclined to stuff 'em in gnome-docu/ but if people have
> > thoughts on better places, now is a very good time to say.
> 
> That sounds like a good location to me. It's rather of a junk pile in
> there right now, though, and the cleanest thing might be an entirely new
> subdirectory: gnome-docu/gnome2-global-docs or some such. Then each
> could get its own subdirectory, to whit:
> 
> gnome-docu/gnome2-global-docs/g2portability/C/g2portability.xml or some
> such.

It's possible I have been reading too much usability-related mail or
something, but the redundancy here is striking. If the subdirectory is
gnome2-global-docs, then we don't need to prefix everything else with
'g2', right? :-)

I do agree with at least putting all this stuff in a subdirectory,
though, since that will also make it easier to roll a developer-docs
package, etc, and those of us who only want the TelsaDocs ..er ...
gnome2-global-docs module can just pull the relevant subdirectory,
rather than the whole ball of wax.

> That should make it a relatively easy structure for Jeff to pull from.

Oh, yeah, plus there's the "be nice to Jeff" side effect. :)

Malcolm