Re: Problems with xmllint

[John Fleck <jfleck inkstain net>]

Kevin -

I need a file to look at to help diagnose these.

The best thing would be if you could come up with a separate minimal
one in each case that isolates and duplicates the error without a lot
of other stuff around it.

Often when doing that I figure out what is causing the error.

You can email them to me off list if you want so as not to spam
everyone else with attachments.

Cheers,

John

On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 05:26:39PM -0600, Kevin Breit wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 	I have a few bug reports about xmllint.  I don't know if this is the
> right list.  But since John Fleck is on here, he maybe able to help
> among others.
> 
> Note: I don't know if the things I am reporting are problems with my XML
> or with xmllint.  Please let me know!
> 
> I get a ton of:
> file:line: validity error: ID idname already defined
>    <tag id="idname">
> errors.  Yet, they're defined only once.
> 
> I have yet another bug.  It seems kind of poor at managing tags that
> span multiple lines.  For example:
> 
> <imagedata fileref="figures/vfolder-createrule-fig"
> format="PNG"
> srccedit="Aaron Weber">
> 
> When it errors, it shows the last line:
> 
> usage-mail-org.xml:1035: validity error: Value "png" for attribute
> format on imagedata is not among the enumerated set
>           srccredit="Aaron Weber">
> 
> If people could give me a hand with these errors or say they're a bug
> and get them fixed, that would be much appreciated!
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Kevin
> 
> PS. I am using xmllint: using libxml version 20412
> 
> PPS. One more bug, how about that!  xmllint --version prints the version
> at the top and then the usage list.  It should just show the version and
> poop you back to a command line.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list

-- 
John Fleck
jfleck inkstain net (h), http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/
"I've noticed that most artists only repeat themselves."
 - Marcel Duchamp