Re: DocBook XML validation
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Daniel Carrera <dcarrera math toronto edu>
- Cc: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: DocBook XML validation
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:54:51 -0500
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:02:39PM -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm still trying to get the DocBook XML right. I've made progress, but
> some errors still elude me. I'm using xmllint to test the XML.
>
> Summary of errors (details in the PS):
> 1) When I don't use the --valid flag, xmllint complains that mdash; is
> not defined.
Already answered,
> 2) When I use the --valid flag, the above error disappears, but I get
Already answered,
> errors over <graphic> (which it thinks should be an empty tag) and
> <artheader> (which it thinks does not exist).
It means that your Document is not valid w.r.t. the DocBook definition.
Which is right:
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/graphic.html
and artheader don't seems to exist (anymore ?)
> Does anyone know what's going on? and how to fix these?
Read the docbook doc, and fix your tags
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/docbook.html
> I thought I read somewhere that <graphic> had been deprecated, but I can't
> find the page anywhere. I don't know what to use instead.
No idea about that, I don't know DB well,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]