Re: Summary of module branches for GNOME 2.2

[Breda McColgan <breda mccolgan sun com>]

Thanks a million to both Sander and Malcolm for replying so promptly and
comprehensively!

Regards,
Breda.



Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> 
> Hi Breda.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:01:41PM +0000, Breda McColgan wrote:
> > does a "GNOME 2.0" branch exist? If so, how should we specify it:
> >  -r 2
> >  -r 2.0
> >
> > If a bug is logged against a GNOME 2.0 document, (or if a bug logged
> > against a later version also applies to the GNOME 2.0 version of the
> > document), where should we put the updated document for GNOME 2.0?
> 
> Here's the (mostly, probably) complete list for GNOME 2.0:
> 
> bonobo-activation: -r gnome-2-0
> bug-buddy: -r gnome-2-0
> eel: -r gnome-2-0
> eog: -r gnome-2-0
> gail: -r gnome-2-0
> gconf-editor: -r gnome-2-0
> gconf: -r gconf-1-2
> gedit: -r gnome-2-0
> glade: -r glade-gnome2-branch
> glib: -r glib-2-0
> gnome-applets: -r gnome-2-0
> gnome-common: -r gnome-2-0
> gnome-control-center: -r gnome-2-0
> gnome-desktop: -r gnome-2-0
> gnome-games: -r gnome-2-0
> gnome-panel: -r gnome-2-0
> gnome-session: -r gnome-2-0
> gnome-terminal: -r gnome-2-0
> gnome-utils: -r gnome-2-0
> gnome-vfs: -r gnome-2-0
> gtkhtml2: -r gnome-2-0
> gtk+: -r gtk-2-0
> libgnomecanvas: -r gnome-2-0
> libgnomeprint: -r gnome-2-0
> libgnomeprintui: -r gnome-2-0
> libgnome: -r gnome-2-0
> libgnomeui: -r gnome-2-0
> libgtop: -r libgtop-GNOME-2-0-port
> libwnck: -r gnome-2-0
> linc: -r gnome-2-0
> nautilus: -r gnome-2-0
> ORBit2: -r gnome-2-0
> pango: -r pango-1-0
> sawfish: -r gnome-2
> yelp: -r gnome-2-0
> 
> So it's pretty much as Sander indicated in another mail (-r gnome-2-0),
> except for glade, gtk+, libgtop and sawfish.
> 
> Cheers,
> Malcolm
> 
> --
> Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list