Re: any gconf-editor doc?
- From: Chee Bin HOH <cbhoh mimos my>
- To: Eugene Oconnor sun com
- Cc: John Fleck <jfleck inkstain net>, gnome-doc-list <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, Tomas Oconnor sun com, Colm Smyth sun com
- Subject: Re: any gconf-editor doc?
- Date: 09 Sep 2003 18:17:04 +0800
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 18:07, Eugene O'Connor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Actually, I've already written documentation for the GConf editor.
> Sorry, I forgot that there was an entry for it in the DocTable. It is in
> the GConf chapter of the GNOME 2.4 Desktop System Administration Guide
> which I put back last night.
Will the section be split out as an individual docs for GConf editor
too?
>
> I hope to get the updated System Administration Guide up on
> http://www.gnome.org/learn soon - when I do, I'll announce it on this
> list. It would be great to get your review comments on the documentation
> - perhaps when it is up there you could review it and send me comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Eugene
>
> Chee Bin HOH wrote:
> >
> > Hi john,
> >
> > Since the app is stabilized, I will start writing docs for it, you can
> > add me to the doctable.
> >
> > regards, ;)
> > HOH
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 11:11, John Fleck wrote:
> > > HOH -
> > >
> > > I corresponded with Anders Carlsson, the maintainer, in July and he
> > > indicated he thinks the app has stabilized enough to do docs for it. I
> > > think it would be great if you would take it on.
> > >
> > > If you'd like, I'll add you to the doctable for it.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 19:00, Chee Bin HOH wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Any one working on the documentation for gconf-editor? According to the
> > > > doctable, gconf-editor has no maintainer and writer. I am interested in
> > > > writing the documentation for it since I find myself often using it when
> > > > I hacking some programs that use gconf.
> > > >
> > > > But the question is, the doctable states that `Documentation to be
> > > > delayed until interface stabilizes`, is gconf-editor 2.3.6 for GNOME 2.4
> > > > considered to be UI stable?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > HOH
> > --
> > Chee Bin HOH (cbhoh yahoo com)
> >
> > "Where we're going, we don't need roads...", GNOME (http://www.gnome.org)
> >
> > Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> > See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-doc-list mailing list
> > gnome-doc-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
--
Chee Bin HOH (cbhoh yahoo com)
"Where we're going, we don't need roads...", GNOME (http://www.gnome.org)
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]