Re: Introduction to GNOME in 2.6

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

Seems very reasonable, though how long is the section in question? Would
it be impossible to rewrite over the weekend?
Luis

On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 16:26 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:

> On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 08:34, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> > Hi guys:
> > "Introduction to GNOME" document - in gnome-user-docs package - was not
> > updated in a while (since summer, I believe). This is my fault - didn't
> > have time to do it. In its curretn form, it will do more harm than good
> > if we ship it with GNOME 2.6. 
> > 
> > So I'd suggest removing it altogether from the package, at least for now
> > - and probalby for good. Do we need release team blessing for this? 
> 
> So gnome2-user-docs 2.6.0 shipped with Intro, because this completely
> slipped my mind.  Soon thereafter, somebody was complaining on IRC that
> he was seeing GNOME 2.2 docs with the latest GARNOME.  The document in
> question was, of course, "Introduction to GNOME".
> 
> I have to agree that having an outdated Intro does more harm than good. 
> All the information people need is in the User Guide, though Intro may
> have provided it in a more digestable form.
> 
> Release team:  Given the 2.6.0 extension due to the recent attacks,
> would it be acceptable to roll a 2.6.0-1 with Intro removed?
> 
> --
> Shaun
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team