Re: Changing "Linux" with "GNU/Linux" or "GNU"
- From: Joachim Noreiko <jnoreiko yahoo com>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>, Don Scorgie <DonScorgie Blueyonder co uk>
- Cc: rms gnu org, gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Changing "Linux" with "GNU/Linux" or "GNU"
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:35:24 +0100 (BST)
--- Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org> wrote:
> Program source, on the other hand, is under
> maintainer control.
> Gnome is a confederacy. Maintainers have nearly
> complete control
> over their modules. Basically, these are the hard
> requirements
> maintainers sign up for in being part of our
> release:
>
> 1) Follow our release cycle, including freezes.
> 2) Give the GTP control of your translations.
> 3) Don't break API/ABI if you're in the platform.
>
> We say things like "work with the usability folks"
> and "work with
> the documentation folks", but those things don't *de
> facto* lead
> to relinquishing any amount of control over CVS.
>
> This is just the way our community works. Other
> communities are
> structured differently, but we are who we are.
> Power grabs will
> inevitably fail in Gnome. We have to devise
> solutions that work
> well within our community.
Getting far off-topic, but I see many ways in which
this structure doesn't serve gnome or its users well.
We have problems with desktop-wide consistency,
adherence to the HIG, and so on.
I *want* there to be someone or some team that can
wade in and make these sorts of changes when the
maintainers won't.
___________________________________________________________
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]