Re: More developer.gnome.org cleanup
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: "A. Walton" <awalton gnome org>
- Cc: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>, gnome-doc-list <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: More developer.gnome.org cleanup
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:21:42 +0200
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 14:54 -0400, A. Walton wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 12:12 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >> Time for more developer.gnome.org cleanup. We need to move more stuff to
> >> library.gnome.org or to the wiki or accept that it's old and useless.
> >> Any volunteers?
> >>
> >> The Nautilus Internals document
> >> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/whitepapers/nautilus/nautilus-internals.html
> >> needs to be changed to DocBook from sxw (OpenOffice).
> >> http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/nautilus/trunk/docs/nautilus-internals.sxw?view=log
> >> Then it can be put on library.gnome.org automatically whenever Nautilus
> >> tarballs are released.
> >
> > Are there Nautilus developers that could be bugged about this?
> > Maintainers are generally responsible for their own internal
> > architecture documentation.
> >
>
> We could be bugged about it, but as it stands there's little in that
> document that is of relevance to Nautilus' current infrastructure. It
> speaks mostly of Corba and Bonobo components, GnomeVFS and
> libbackground and other non-existent things. It needs a complete
> rewrite for relevance past Nautilus 2.22.
>
> -A. Walton
OK. I am going to try to remove any traces of this document from the
world. It will be in svn's history if anybody really wants to use it as
the basis for a new document one day.
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]