Re: Peer Review Request

[Paul Cutler <pcutler foresightlinux org>]

Thanks Milo.  Go ahead and push it, Sandy forgot to patch it for the last release.  Tomboy is going through a discussion right now regarding it's version numbering, so we should probably leave it as is.

We (the Tomboy team) are scheduling a bug day in the next week or two - I'll follow up with Sandy on versioning then and fix it then.

Thanks!

Paul

2009/5/3 Milo Casagrande <milo casagrande name>

Hi,

Il giorno ven, 27/03/2009 alle 18.57 -0500, Paul Cutler ha scritto:

>
> Tomboy:  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576487 (Patch in Bugzilla)
>
> * Pulse status (marked techreview - needs dev review)
> * Bug fix for #500803 that fixes the metadata description for Tomboy
> * Adds documentation for Microsoft Windows, including differentiation
> in the docs for GNOME Panel and taskbar in Microsoft Windows
>
> If it would be easier to just review the xml files to open directly in
> Yelp rather than patching, please send me an email and I'll send you
> the xml as an attachment.
>
> I've only contributed to GNOME docs once before, looking forward to
> the feedback on things I should change or do better.

I've taken a look at the patch and at the overall document after
applying it; for me, FWIW, it looks OK.

There is only one thing: the revision numbering scheme. The revision
number should reflect the big number of GNOME (in this case 2) plus the
minor number of the manual. So a manual for the first version of a
program in the 2.26 version of GNOME should be 2.0, the first revision
should be 2.1 and so on...

Don't know if it's possible to change that at this time though.

Anyway, if it's OK I could apply it and push it to git.

--
Milo Casagrande <milo casagrande name>

_______________________________________________
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnome-doc-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list