Re: UI freeze break request for evolution

[Karsten Bräckelmann <guenther rudersport de>]

On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 00:58 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.03.2010, 17:22 -0600 schrieb Shaun McCance:
> > On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 04:32 +0530, chen wrote:

> > >    I would like to remove couple of preference options which are not
> > implemented in the new imapx provider. I was planning to implement
> > them,
> > > but with other fixes to be made, had to post-pone them. It would be
> > good to remove them for evolution 2.30 and add them for the next
> > release. 

> > Release team: The Evolution documentation is handled by a team
> > internal to Novell, and not by the Gnome documentation team.
> > They're the only ones who can tell you if any impact on the
> > documentation can be addressed in time.
> 
> I give an r-t approval as no documentation about imapx exists at all in
> Evo's user docs currently, hence nothing to break/change here.

r-t approval 2/2, go ahead

> (But as every six months I'm wondering whether the docs will be updated
> again a few days before the .0 release so that translators have no time
> to also update their user doc translations.
> Did I just sigh?)

/me nods, heard the sigh


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}