Re: Old manual versions that lack licenses
- From: Richard Stallman <rms gnu org>
- To: Frederic Peters <fpeters gnome org>
- Cc: gnome-doc-devel-list gnome org, gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Old manual versions that lack licenses
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:17:53 -0500
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> About "Disk Usage Analyzer" (né baobab), the oldest online version is
> 2.32, its legal mention is here and mentions GFDL:
> https://help.gnome.org/users/baobab/2.32/index-info.html
I am glad it did have a free license. Maybe the person who reported
this was misled by the HTML output as you suggested.
It is important to include the license in the output.
But I see something else bad seems to be happening:
> The rewritten version is at https://help.gnome.org/users/baobab/3.14/
> and licensed as CC by-sa.
It's not good for a GNU manual converted to a non-GNU license.
> The GNOME Desktop System Administration Guide is in the same
> situation, with oldest version as GFDL and available here:
> https://help.gnome.org/admin/system-admin-guide/2.32/index-info.html
> and newest version as CC by-sa and online here:
> https://help.gnome.org/admin/system-admin-guide/3.14/
It looks like this is a systematic trend, and it might get worse.n
Do you know who is responsible? What can we do about it?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]