Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Menu Line Standardization
- From: Soren Harward <soren cinternet net>
- To: Chris Jantzen <chris maybe net>
- cc: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Menu Line Standardization
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 14:23:24 -0400 (EDT)
Yeah. What do you think my main contribution has been to this project?
My C has a LONG way to go before it catches up to my English.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Soren Harward | Windows 95/98 DOES come
Internet Information Systems Administrator | with a tool to recover
Cinternet, Inc. | from Registry
Voice: 891-1228 soren@cinternet.net | corruption.
http://www.cinternet.net/~soren/ | It's called 'FDISK'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 10 Aug 1998, Chris Jantzen wrote:
>John R Sheets writes:
> > Then they won't get so-and-so level of compliance. And they're
> > free to. They can still release their app in whatever form they
> > like. It may be a killer GNOME app, with very advanced features.
> > But until it has good, reliable docs, it should not, IMHO, get
> > higher compliance. If compliance is important enough to the
> > programmer, he will deal with the docs, or get someone else to do
> > them.
> > It is more important to have GNOME in a solid, well-documented
> > state, that it is to play PR games with programmers (of which, I am
> > one, so I'm slipping my own neck into the noose, too).
>
>My gosh! The voice of reason! That's three out of four or five coders
>I know on this list who agree that documentation is a high
>priority... You non-coders paying attention?
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]