Re: levels of compliance
- From: Scott Goehring <scott poverty bloomington in us>
- To: sungod <as387 yfn ysu edu>
- cc: Federico Mena Quintero <federico nuclecu unam mx>, gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: levels of compliance
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 22:42:14 -0500
"sungod" == sungod <as387@yfn.ysu.edu> writes:
sungod> of course, if you go ahead and make those changes on your own
sungod> while we're hammering away at real content i don't see a
sungod> problem with it. i'd like to hear from anybody who still sees
sungod> the value of five-level stratification.
I think the standard terms ("MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
"SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL") defined in RFC 2119 should be adequate for the purpose of
this style guide.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]